Abstract
BackgroundAcoustic positioning telemetry is nowadays widely used in behavioural ecology of aquatic animals. Data on the animal’s geographical location and its changes through time are used to study for instance movement patterns, habitat use and migration. The acoustic signals are detected by stand-alone receivers, allowing to collect huge amounts of data over long periods of time. However, large volumes of data might contain large errors. The traditional Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) method used to calculate underwater positions, is a point-by-point approach: every position is calculated independently of all other positions. This method assumes that the acoustic transmissions follow a linear path. In many environments, this assumption is violated, for instance by reflections of the acoustic signal against hard surfaces, such as rock formations and concrete walls, or by diffractions around obstacles. Hence, acoustic positioning datasets usually require additional filtering. Unfortunately, the performance of the available filtering techniques is often unclear or ambiguous, especially when reflections occur. An alternative to the point-by-point approach, is a track-oriented approach, as used by YAPS (Yet Another Positioning System). This novel algorithm uses the information that is present in previous and subsequent positions, by combining a model of fish behaviour with Time of Arrival (TOA) of the signals on the receivers. In this study, we investigated the performance of two filtering techniques applied to positions provided by the Vemco Positioning System (VPS) in a highly reflective environment. We compared the unfiltered VPS positions with a standard filtering technique, making use of the Horizontal Positioning Error (HPE), and developed a new filter based on receiver cluster classification. Finally, we recalculated the positions with YAPS and compared the performance of this system to the two filtering techniques.ResultsThe performance of the VPS system was strongly impeded by the multiple reflections occurring in this study area, but lowering the power output of transmitters can slightly attenuate this issue. None of the filtering techniques was able to compensate for reflections and to improve the positioning accuracy significantly. Only the YAPS algorithm could cope with the high level of reflectivity in this study site.ConclusionsPoint-by-point algorithms might fail to provide accurate fine-scale tracks in a highly reflective acoustic environment. As this study has shown, the YAPS algorithm can provide a successful alternative, even in these difficult conditions.
Highlights
Acoustic positioning telemetry is nowadays widely used in behavioural ecology of aquatic animals
This paper evaluates the performance of a TDOAbased system in a highly reflective case study in the Albert Canal in Belgium, comprising concrete canal walls and a corner protruding in the receiver array
All filtering methods succeeded in removing some erroneous positions, but none of the methods achieved the accuracy of the Yet Another Positioning System (YAPS) positions
Summary
Acoustic positioning telemetry is nowadays widely used in behavioural ecology of aquatic animals. Single receiver detections yield presence/ absence data, but do not allow to investigate fine-scale movement, such as for instance swimming behaviour related to hydrodynamics near structures [5, 6] and finescale habitat use [7, 8]. In this case, a dense network of receivers with overlapping ranges is used to calculate 2D (or 3D) positions, resulting in movement tracks. High accuracies are needed for instance in ecohydraulic studies, where the interaction between animals and hydraulics is studied at metre to sub-metre scale
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.