Abstract

The capabilities of an aeroacoustic wave equation based on Pierce’s operator (AWE-PO) for modeling subsonic flow-induced sound and for sound prediction are investigated. The wave equation is applied to an isothermal two-dimensional mixing layer computed by direct numerical simulation. In contrast to a direct numerical simulation, providing the acoustic fluctuations directly, the simulations based on Lighthill’s wave equation and the AWE-PO rely on a hybrid workflow to predict the generated sound field. Special attention is put on the interpretation of the right-hand side of both wave equations. Comparing the terms on the right-hand side in Lighthill’s theory and AWE-PO suggests a source amplitude for AWE-PO that is 90% smaller. This reduction is attributed to the filtering property of the material derivative. Finally, the results of the acoustic far-field pressure are compared. It is shown that the radiated sound field’s directivity, propagation, and convection effects are well captured for both wave equations. The computations using Lighthill’s equation and AWE-PO are found to provide acoustic intensities within 1.8 dB from the reference direct numerical simulation. This error is comparable with the errors reported for Lighthill’s equation in previous studies.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.