Abstract

Acoustic emission monitoring is a useful technique to deal with detection and identification of damage in composite materials. Over the last few years, identification of damage through intelligent signal processing was particularly emphasized. Data-driven models are developed to predict the remaining useful lifetime. Finite elements modeling (FEM) was used to simulate AE signals due to fiber break and fiber/matrix debonding in a model carbon fiber composite and thereby better understand the AE signals and physical phenomena. This paper presents a computational analysis of AE waveforms resulting from fiber break and fiber/matrix debonding. The objective of this research was to compare the AE signals from a validated fiber break simulation to the AE signals obtained from fiber/matrix debonding and fiber break obtained in several media and to discuss the capability to detect and identify each source.

Highlights

  • Diagnostics consist in detecting and identifying the different damage mechanisms. This step is crucial for the reliability of these structures [3,4] and ensuring successful prognostic strategies, which still need to be developed [5,6,7]. These methods exploit the data measured by a network of sensors located on the structure in order to determine the damage state; the prognostic strategies can predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of the structure [8,9]

  • Since the proposed finite element (FE) model was quantitatively validated against experimental results in the case of fiber break, we extended it to simulate debonding and assess the influence of the damage mechanism on the AE signal

  • The experimental signals and the simulated signals are presented in order to show the validation of the modeling approach before expanding this numerical investigation to different media and different damage mechanisms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Composite materials are used in several applications such as aircraft structural components or in civil infrastructures due to their high structural performance. These materials may exhibit damage mechanisms such as matrix cracking, fiber break, fiber/matrix debonding and delamination. Diagnostics consist in detecting and identifying the different damage mechanisms. This step is crucial for the reliability of these structures [3,4] and ensuring successful prognostic strategies, which still need to be developed [5,6,7]. These methods exploit the data measured by a network of sensors located on the structure in order to determine the damage state; the prognostic strategies can predict the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of the structure [8,9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call