Abstract
The present article aims to demonstrate the legal and constitutional viability of the Non prosecution Agreement (NPA). Thus, in order to achieve the proposed objective, it will be traced, at first, the historical chronology that led to the prediction in the legislative scope of the ANPP, an institute of negotiated criminal justice that, based on criteria of regulated discretion, seeks to confer greater effectiveness to criminal prosecution in a broad sense, and all this is related to the characteristics of this relevant legal institute. Thus, in the final considerations, it is concluded that the ANPP, through the updating of its dogmas, is able to make the criminal prosecution faster and more effective, reaffirming the democratic-persecutorial model par excellence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
