Abstract

IntroductionWorkplace-based assessment in competency-based medical education employs entrustment-supervision scales to suggest trainee competence. However, clinical supervision involves many factors and entrustment decision-making likely reflects more than trainee competence. We do not fully understand how a supervisor’s impression of trainee competence is reflected in their provision of clinical support. We must better understand this relationship to know whether documenting level of supervision truly reflects trainee competence.MethodsWe undertook a collective case study of supervisor-trainee dyads consisting of attending internal medicine physicians and senior residents working on clinical teaching unit inpatient wards. We conducted field observations of typical daily activities and semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed within each dyad and compared across dyads to identify supervisory behaviours, what triggered the behaviours, and how they related to judgments of trainee competence.ResultsTen attending physician-senior resident dyads participated in the study. We identified eight distinct supervisory behaviours. The behaviours were enacted in response to trainee and non-trainee factors. Supervisory behaviours corresponded with varying assessments of trainee competence, even within a dyad. A change in the attending’s judgment of the resident’s competence did not always correspond with a change in subsequent observable supervisory behaviours.DiscussionThere was no consistent relationship between a trigger for supervision, the judgment of trainee competence, and subsequent supervisory behaviour. This has direct implications for entrustment assessments tying competence to supervisory behaviours, because supervision is complex. Workplace-based assessments that capture narrative data including the rationale for supervisory behaviours may lead to deeper insights than numeric entrustment ratings.Supplementary InformationThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00652-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Workplace-based assessment in competency-based medical education employs entrustment-supervision scales to suggest trainee competence

  • Supervisory behaviours corresponded with varying assessments of trainee competence, even within a dyad

  • There was no consistent relationship between a trigger for supervision, the judgment of trainee competence, and subsequent supervisory behaviour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Workplace-based assessment in competency-based medical education employs entrustment-supervision scales to suggest trainee competence. Holzhausen’s conceptual model of entrustment decision-making [5] outlines how a trainee’s characteristics can lead to the intention to entrust, but the actual level of supervision provided is still moderated by perceived risk, supervisor characteristics, and the supervisor-trainee relationship. Consistent with this conceptualization, supervisors and trainees tend to place high levels of supervision and high levels of autonomy at opposite ends of a spectrum [6, 7]. Entrustment decision-making may not follow a single path from a judgment of competence to granting of entrustment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call