Abstract
Research Article| November 01, 2011 Acidification, anoxia, and extinction: A multiple logistic regression analysis of extinction selectivity during the Middle and Late Permian Matthew E. Clapham; Matthew E. Clapham * 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California−Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA *E-mails: mclapham@ucsc.edu; jlpayne@stanford.edu. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jonathan L. Payne Jonathan L. Payne * 2Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 320, Stanford, California 94305, USA *E-mails: mclapham@ucsc.edu; jlpayne@stanford.edu. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Matthew E. Clapham * 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California−Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA Jonathan L. Payne * 2Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 320, Stanford, California 94305, USA *E-mails: mclapham@ucsc.edu; jlpayne@stanford.edu. Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 06 Mar 2011 Revision Received: 13 Jun 2011 Accepted: 21 Jun 2011 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 © 2011 Geological Society of America Geology (2011) 39 (11): 1059–1062. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32230.1 Article history Received: 06 Mar 2011 Revision Received: 13 Jun 2011 Accepted: 21 Jun 2011 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Matthew E. Clapham, Jonathan L. Payne; Acidification, anoxia, and extinction: A multiple logistic regression analysis of extinction selectivity during the Middle and Late Permian. Geology 2011;; 39 (11): 1059–1062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G32230.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Patterns of taxonomic and ecologic selectivity are the most direct record of processes influencing survival during background and mass extinctions. The Guadalupian (Capitanian) and end-Permian (Changhsingian) extinctions have both been linked to environmental degradation from eruption of large flood basalts; however, the extent to which taxonomic selectivity conforms to the expected stresses remains incompletely understood because many of the relevant biological traits are mutually correlated. Here we use a large occurrence-based database to quantify extinction selectivity during background and mass extinction intervals from the Kungurian (latest Early Permian) to Changhsingian. Our multiple logistic regression analysis confirms that the end-Permian extinction was a physiological crisis, selecting against genera with poorly buffered respiratory physiology and calcareous shells. Genera with unbuffered physiology also fared poorly in the Guadalupian extinction, consistent with recognition of a pronounced crisis only among protists and reef-builders and implying similar respiratory physiological stresses. Despite sharing a similar trigger, the end-Permian extinction was considerably more severe than the Guadalupian or other Phanerozoic physiological crises. Its magnitude may have resulted from a larger environmental perturbation, although the combination of warming, hypercapnia, ocean acidification, and hypoxia during the end-Permian extinction likely exacerbated the crisis because of the multiplicative effects of those stresses. Although ocean carbon cycle and evolutionary changes have reduced the sensitivity of modern ecosystems to physiological stresses, extant marine invertebrates face the same synergistic effects of multiple stressors that were so severe during the end-Permian extinction. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.