Abstract
AbstractA comparison has been made of the acid hydrolysis of dry, defatted chicken muscle protein by open reflux and sealed tube methods. It was found necessary to agitate the sealed tube hydrolysate vigorously in order to remove all traces of peptide material and attain satisfactory hydrolysis. The difference in ease of hydrolysis between the two methods may be due to agglomeration of the protein fibrils during hydrolysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
