Abstract
The effectiveness of any healthcare-related research governance system is dependent on its ability to identify, challenge and change practices that compromise its ability to deliver timely, proportionate review. We present a case study outlining our experience of obtaining research ethics committee (REC) and Public Benefit and Privacy Panel (PBPP) for Health and Social Care approval to conduct a study which aimed to collect data on diagnostic and care pathways and determine the national prevalence of two rare diseases in Scotland. We discuss the threats posed to low-risk observational epidemiological research by disproportionate governance practices and propose practical solutions. In the context of increasing investment, the ever-increasing barriers to doing high-quality, low-risk epidemiological research using patient-identifiable information is concerning. Information governance committees, guided by clinical researchers, must step up as leaders in this area, making use of flexibilities and opportunities within the law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
