Abstract

From its first use in paracetamol (Acetaminophen, APAP) overdose, oral acetylcysteine (NAC) was controversial [1,2]. Intravenous (IV) NAC was initially no less provocative [3,4]. Yet, over a few short years both the 72-h oral, and the 20-h IV protocols rapidly became standard practices. Three facts likely hampered altering these regimens: (1) The case-fatality rate in untreated patients was very low. (2) The case-fatality rate in NAC-treated patients was even lower, suggesting efficacy. (3) Although some patients developed hepatotoxicity despite NAC, recovery was generally complete and uneventful.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.