Abstract

Exact computation of the shape and size of robot manipulator workspace is very important for its analysis and optimum design. First, the drawbacks of the previous methods based on Monte Carlo are pointed out in the paper, and then improved strategies are presented systematically. In order to obtain more accurate boundary points of two-dimensional (2D) robot workspace, the Beta distribution is adopted to generate random variables of robot joints. And then, the area of workspace is acquired by computing the area of the polygon what is a closed path by connecting the boundary points together. For comparing the errors of workspaces which are generated by the previous and the improved method from shape and size, one planar robot manipulator is taken as example. A spatial robot manipulator is used to illustrate that the methods can be used not only on planar robot manipulator, but also on the spatial. The optimal parameters are proposed in the paper to computer the shape and size of 2D and 3D workspace. Finally, we provided the computation time and discussed the generation of 3D workspace which is based on 3D reconstruction from the boundary points.

Highlights

  • The workspace of robot manipulator is defined as the set of points that can be reached by its end‐effector

  • A systematic algorithm was developed in this paper to determine and display 2D and 3D manipulators workspace boundary curves and estimate their sizes

  • This method takes advantage of the properties of the Beta distribution of joint variable and kinematics function to obtain the more accurate approximate workspace composed of point cloud

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The workspace of robot manipulator is defined as the set of points that can be reached by its end‐effector. Since the Monte Carlo method involves no inverse Jacobian calculation, is relatively simple to apply and has been used by many investigators to generate workspace boundary and the corresponding size [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Most of these works can only determine workspace boundary curves for 2D manipulators [33,34,35,36, 38, 39].

Two illustrative examples
Features of the previous method
Distribution characteristics of Monte Carlo points in workspace
Probability density distribution of manipulator joints variables
Beta Distribution and determination of parameters
Algorithm description
Error comparison
Depicting boundary curves of 3D robot manipulator
Volume calculation
Result and discussion
Findings
Conclusion
10. References
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call