Abstract
In the past decade and half since their introduction, multiple frameworks of mechanistic models were made available to enable the quantification of loss of lithium inventory and loss of active materials. They usually come either with capacity/state of charge- or lithiation-based matching for the electrodes. While both approaches were believed to be equivalent, the present work will show that they are not when used with materials that are not fully delithiated at end-of-charge because they differ on how they account for inaccessible lithium. Herein, we will explain these discrepancies and propose new equations to improve both types of frameworks.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
