Abstract

BackgroundPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed.MethodsWe applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR–reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples.ResultsIn 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples.ConclusionsOur results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.

Highlights

  • Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab

  • Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations detected by bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (PCR)-rSSO We analyzed formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues from 50 patients with colorectal cancer

  • KRAS and NRAS mutations detected by bridged nucleic acid (BNA)-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing We analyzed the 50 samples for KRAS and NRAS mutations using BNA-clamp PCR (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. Anti-EGFR therapy is beneficial in approximately 15% of patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal tumors, whereas patients with KRAS-mutated tumors show little response [1,2,3,4,5]. Anti-EGFR therapy is more beneficial to patients with wild-type NRAS and BRAF [6,7,8]. It is well-known that somatic hotspot mutations are located in codons 12 and 13 (exon 2), codons 59 and 61 (exon 3), and codons 117 and 146 (exon 4) of KRAS and NRAS genes, and in codon 600 (exon 15) in BRAF. KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations occur in colorectal cancers in a mutually exclusive manner [10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call