Abstract

The outstanding optoelectronics and photovoltaic properties of metal halide perovskites, including high carrier motilities, low carrier recombination rates, and the tunable spectral absorption range are attributed to the unique electronic properties of these materials. While DFT provides reliable structures and stabilities of perovskites, it performs poorly in electronic structure prediction. The relativistic GW approximation has been demonstrated to be able to capture electronic structure accurately, but at an extremely high computational cost. Here we report efficient and accurate band gap calculations of halide metal perovskites by using the approximate quasiparticle DFT-1/2 method. Using AMX3 (A = CH3NH3, CH2NHCH2, Cs; M = Pb, Sn, X=I, Br, Cl) as demonstration, the influence of the crystal structure (cubic, tetragonal or orthorhombic), variation of ions (different A, M and X) and relativistic effects on the electronic structure are systematically studied and compared with experimental results. Our results show that the DFT-1/2 method yields accurate band gaps with the precision of the GW method with no more computational cost than standard DFT. This opens the possibility of accurate electronic structure prediction of sophisticated halide perovskite structures and new materials design for lead-free materials.

Highlights

  • The outstanding optoelectronics and photovoltaic properties of metal halide perovskites, including high carrier motilities, low carrier recombination rates, and the tunable spectral absorption range are attributed to the unique electronic properties of these materials

  • Comparison of DFT and DFT-1/2 applied to pseudo-cubic CH3NH3PbI3

  • To compare the performance of DFT-1/2 with standard DFT in electronic structure calculations, we choose as an example the most studied metal halide perovskite CH3NH3PbI3 with a pseudo-cubic structure

Read more

Summary

Computational methods and structural models

The initial structure optimizations are performed using DFT within the local density approximation (LDA)[19] as implemented in the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP)[20]. The outermost s, p, and d (in the case of Pb and Sn) electrons are treated as valence electrons whose interactions with the remaining ions is modeled by pseudopotentials generated within the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method[22]. Taking CH3NH3PbI3 as an example, unit cells with 12, 48, and () 48 atoms are used for the case of cubic, tetragonal, and orthorhombic crystal structures, respectively. The positions of the atoms, and the shape and volume of the unit cell are all allowed to relax.

Atom Pb Sn Cl Br I
Results and Discussion
Author Contributions
Additional Information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call