Abstract

Recently, maintaining a certain oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) range in mechanically ventilated patients was recommended; attaching the INTELLiVENT-ASV to ventilators might be beneficial. We evaluated the SpO2 measurement accuracy of a Nihon Kohden and a Masimo monitor compared to actual arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). SpO2 was simultaneously measured by a Nihon Kohden and Masimo monitor in patients consecutively admitted to a general intensive care unit and mechanically ventilated. Bland–Altman plots were used to compare measured SpO2 with actual SaO2. One hundred mechanically ventilated patients and 1497 arterial blood gas results were reviewed. Mean SaO2 values, Nihon Kohden SpO2 measurements, and Masimo SpO2 measurements were 95.7%, 96.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. The Nihon Kohden SpO2 measurements were less biased than Masimo measurements; their precision was not significantly different. Nihon Kohden and Masimo SpO2 measurements were not significantly different in the “SaO2 < 94%” group (P = 0.083). In the “94% ≤ SaO2 < 98%” and “SaO2 ≥ 98%” groups, there were significant differences between the Nihon Kohden and Masimo SpO2 measurements (P < 0.0001; P = 0.006; respectively). Therefore, when using automatically controlling oxygenation with INTELLiVENT-ASV in mechanically ventilated patients, the Nihon Kohden SpO2 sensor is preferable.Trial registration UMIN000027671. Registered 7 June 2017.

Highlights

  • Maintaining a certain oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ­(SpO2) range in mechanically ventilated patients was recommended; attaching the INTELLiVENT-ASV to ventilators might be beneficial

  • Because INTELLiVENT-ASV is able to monitor and adjust oxygen breath by breath continuously, it is easier to use INTELLiVENT-ASV than a physician-driven control to maintain an appropriate S­ pO2 range. It is unclear how accurate the S­ pO2 measured during INTELLiVENT-ASV compared to the actual ­SaO2

  • We found that Nihon Kohden S­ pO2 measurements presented a lower bias than did Masimo ­SpO2 measurements compared with the actual ­SaO2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maintaining a certain oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry ­(SpO2) range in mechanically ventilated patients was recommended; attaching the INTELLiVENT-ASV to ventilators might be beneficial. We evaluated the ­SpO2 measurement accuracy of a Nihon Kohden and a Masimo monitor compared to actual arterial oxygen saturation ­(SaO2). When using automatically controlling oxygenation with INTELLiVENT-ASV in mechanically ventilated patients, the Nihon Kohden ­SpO2 sensor is preferable. A multicentre randomised trial suggested that maintaining the oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (­ SpO2) at 97% might be ideal for managing critically ill p­ atients[7]. Because INTELLiVENT-ASV is able to monitor and adjust oxygen breath by breath continuously, it is easier to use INTELLiVENT-ASV than a physician-driven control to maintain an appropriate S­ pO2 range It is unclear how accurate the S­ pO2 measured during INTELLiVENT-ASV compared to the actual ­SaO2. We evaluated the accuracy of S­ pO2 measurements in various ­SaO2 range categories

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call