Accuracy of the point source approximation to high dose-rate Ir-192 sources

Abstract

The accuracy of the point source approximation used in dose calculations for an implant comprised of multiple high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 source dwell positions is investigated. First, a single dwell position implant is modeled. The exposure rate about the source is calculated using both the point source approximation and the more rigorous line source formalism. A comparison of these calculated exposure rates is made. It is found that for each HDR Ir-192 source dwell position, the point source approximation results in a dose overestimation of 1% at a distance of 1 cm on the source transverse axis, while dose underestimations of more than 2% can be found at a distance of 1 cm on the source longitudinal axis. Even larger errors occur closer to the source. The results of this academic study are then extended to two clinical cases — an endobronchial treatment and a tandem and ovoids setup, both involving multiple source dwell positions. Since clinical HDR Ir-192 implants are comprised of many individual source dwell positions, there will be inaccuracy in the calculated overall dose distribution leading to dose delivery errors. For example, the dose delivered to a prescription point located 0.5 cm from an endobronchial applicator will be 3% lower than prescribed. Similar errors are produced in gynecologic implants. To decrease below 0.5% the dose delivery error resulting from the point source approximation, prescription points should be at a distance of at least 1 cm from any applicator. Since the dosimetry error is a direct result of the choice of model used to describe the source, the use of anisotropy factors accounting for the variation of photon fluence around the HDR Ir-192 source will not completely correct the calculation.