Abstract

In an effort to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the chest roentgenogram for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, roentgenograms of 152 patients who were all suspected of having pulmonary embolism were randomized and presented to nine interpreters. One hundred eight patients in the series were proven to have pulmonary embolism on the basis of a positive pulmonary angiogram. Forty-four patients were assumed not to have embolism on the basis of either a normal perfusion isotope scan or a pulmonary angiogram which did not show embolism. The interpreters were requested to indicate whether pulmonary embolism was present or absent, or whether they could not tell from the roentgenogram. Readers had no prior knowledge of the actual disease state. The average true-positive ratio (sensitivity) was 0.33, with a range of 0.52 to 0.88. The average true-negative ratio (specificity) was 0.59, with a range of 0.31 to 0.80. The false-positive and false-negative ratios were respectively, 0.21 (range 0.05 to 0.39) and 0.41 (range 0.15 to 0.70). A predictive index, reflecting the overall accuracy of diagnosis, was calculated for the entire group and was 0.40, with a range of 0.17 to 0.57. There appeared to be no correlation between training or experience and accuracy of performance in this study.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.