Abstract

We test methods for measuring and characterizing rough profiles with emphasis on measurements of the self-affine roughness exponent, and describe a simple test to separate between roughness exponents originating from long range correlations in the signs of the profile, and roughness exponents originating from Lévy distributions of jumps. Based on tests on profiles with known roughness exponents we find that the power spectrum density analysis and the averaged wavelet coefficients method give the best estimates for roughness exponents in the range 0.1-0.9. The error bars are found to be less than 0.03 for profile lengths larger than 256, and there is no systematic bias in the estimates. We present quantitative estimates of the error bars and the systematic error and their dependence on the value of the roughness exponent and the profile length. We also quantify how power-law noise can modify the measured roughness exponent for measurement methods different from the power spectrum density analysis and the second order correlation function method.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.