Accuracy of predicting surgical outcomes using interictal electrical source imaging in patients with MRI-negative intractable epilepsy

Abstract

ObjectiveWe investigated the accuracy of interictal electrical source imaging (II-ESI) in localizing the epileptogenic zone in MRI-negative epilepsy patients who underwent epilepsy surgery. We also aimed to compare II-ESI's utility with other presurgical investigations and its role in guiding intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) planning. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with operated MRI-negative intractable epilepsy at our center between 2010 and 2016. All patients underwent video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, high-resolution MRI, 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. We computed II-ESI following the visual identification of interictal spikes, and outcomes were determined using Engel’s classification at 6 months after surgery. ResultsAmong 21 operated MRI-negative intractable epilepsy patients, 15 had sufficient data for II-ESI analysis. Of these, nine patients (60%) showed favorable outcomes corresponding to Engle's classification I and II. The localization accuracy of II-ESI was 53%, which was not significantly different from those of FDG-PET and ictal SPECT (47% and 45%, respectively). Among the patients, iEEG did not cover the areas suggested by II-ESIs in seven cases (47%). In two of those patients (29%), the regions indicated by II-ESIs were not resected, resulting in poor surgical outcomes. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the localization accuracy of II-ESI was comparable to ictal SPECT and the brain FDG-PET scan. II-ESI is a simple, noninvasive method for evaluating the epileptogenic zone and guiding iEEG planning in patients with MRI-negative epilepsy.