Abstract
Nurse aides provide assessments of nursing home residents' functional health for use in care planning and quality assurance. Nurse practitioner assessments can serve as a standard for analysis of nurse aides' accuracy. This study compared nurse aide to nurse practitioner assessments of nursing home residents' functional health with regard to possible bias and extent of correlation. Nurse aides' accuracy in assessing nursing home residents' activities of daily living was evaluated by comparisons to assessments performed by a master's-prepared nurse practitioner using four functional assessment instruments: the Barthel Index, the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living, the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects, and the Scaled Outcome Criteria. Data were collected in a 159-bed nonprofit nursing home licensed for skilled and intermediate care. Residents had a wide variety of functional and cognitive abilities and disabilities. Ninety-six nursing home residents provided data for the study. Functional health assessments by 24 nurse aides, each assessing 4 different nursing home residents, were compared to those of 1 nurse practitioner. Statistical analysis of accuracy used paired samples t-tests and Pearson product moment correlation coefficients. Nurse aide assessments and nurse practitioner assessments were highly correlated. Most functional health assessments evidenced no significant nurse aide bias. When bias was present it usually resulted from nurse aides electing more optimistic choices when using an assessment instrument that offered fewer response levels for rating residents. Nurse aides can accurately use well-calibrated instruments to assess nursing home residents' functional health. Demonstration of assessment accuracy in nurse aides, who provide the majority of direct care for nursing home residents, documented a valuable clinical resource for planning and evaluating resident care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.