Abstract

In this article, the accuracy of standard computational fluid dynamics techniques and turbulence models in predicting the critical flutter speed of streamlined and bluff deck sections is investigated. It is well known that such numerical tools can provide inaccurate prediction of the flow field around bluff bodies which reflects in biases in their aeroelastic behavior. Aiming at systematically study the effects of such inaccuracies, in this article, six deck sections are analyzed by numerically extracting flutter derivatives and calculating the critical flutter speed for a set of representative test structures. It is shown that the flutter onset velocity is mainly underestimated but cases showing opposite behavior are identified and discussed. Two simulation strategies are adopted: the differences in the flutter mechanism between such two approaches are taken as an indicator of possible strong inaccuracies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call