Accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients.

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (EVO 2.0 and Kane) with established formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis and SRK/T) in pediatric cataract patients. Retrospective study. We enrolled 110 eyes (110 patients) in Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. All patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery and implanted with posterior chamber IOL in the bag. We calculate the mean prediction errors (PE) and percentage within 1 diopter (D) at 1month to assess the accuracy, and percentage > 2D was defined as prediction accident. Then, we performed subgroup analysis according to age and axial length (AL). The mean age and AL were 37.45 ± 23.28months and 21.16 ± 1.29mm. The mean PE for all patients was as follows: Barrett (- 0.30), EVO (0.18), Haigis (- 0.74), Kane (- 0.36), and SRK/T (0.58), p < 0.001. In addition, EVO and SRK/T formulas were relatively accurate in patients younger than 24months and with AL ≤ 21mm, while EVO got lower prediction accident rate than SRK/T (3/41 vs 8/41, 4/52 vs 5/52). Moreover, Barrett, EVO, and Kane formulas achieved better accuracy and lower prediction accident rate in patients older than 24months and with AL > 21mm (both > 51/69 and 43/58, and < 3/69 and 3/58). In patients older than 24months and with AL > 21mm, Barrett, EVO, and Kane formulas were relatively accurate, while in patients younger than 24months and with AL ≤ 21mm, EVO was more accurate, followed by SRK/T formula.