Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of microcomputed tomography (mCT) to detect dentinal cracks when compared with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and operating microscopy (OM). Different conditions of pixel size (10 or 17 μm), sample moisture (dry/moist), and transillumination (with/without) were evaluated. Additionally, the influence of the dentinal defect width on its detection was analyzed. The root canals of human mandibular incisors were prepared with the Reciproc R40 instrument (VDW, Munich, Germany). The roots were sectioned 5 and 10 mm from the apex, and mCT scans of middle and apical segments were performed at two pixel sizes: 10 μm and 17 μm, under dry and moist conditions (groups: 10dry, 10moist, 17dry, and 17moist). The operating microscope was used with and without transillumination (groups: OMTrans and OM). Findings showed that accuracy was moderate for the 10dry, 10moist, and OMTrans groups, poor for OM and very poor for 17dry and 17moist. The thickness of the dentin crack significantly influenced its detection by mCT using the resolution of 10 μm in both dry and wet conditions (P = .002), 17 μm in the dry condition (P = .002), and by the operating microscope using transillumination (P = .009). Some cracks visualized in SEM were not detected by mCT and an operating microscope. Not only the mCT resolution but also the sample moisture condition and the dentinal crack width can significantly influence its detection.

Highlights

  • Engine-driven nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments with large tapers have become widely available

  • Some cracks visualized in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were not detected by microcomputed tomography (mCT) and an operating microscope (Table 1)

  • The detection methods were compared in the 18 samples with microcracks identified by SEM; this sample size was larger than a previous study [10] that showed that 10 samples are sufficient to compare the crack detection by mCT or cross-sectioning followed by stereomicroscopy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Engine-driven nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments with large tapers have become widely available. They have been identified as one of the potential etiologic factors of dentinal cracks [1,2,3], referred to as microfractures or dentinal defects [4, 5]. Cracks may evolve to a root fracture and result in tooth loss [6]. The mCT offers some advantages when compared with the direct analysis of the root surfaces obtained by the cross-sectioning method because it allows a threedimensional and nondestructive evaluation of specimens, and successive scans can be used after different treatment procedures. MCT can lead to false-negative results because of several variables, such as the ones evaluated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call