Abstract
Statement of ProblemLimited information is available regarding the accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices (MTLDs) after their clinical use. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of 2 types of MTLDs (friction-style and spring-style) after clinical use. Material and methodsTwenty-seven MTLDs in clinical service at The Ohio State University College of Dentistry were collected. Thirteen were friction-style and 14 were spring-style. A total of 6 different dental implant companies were represented (Astra Tech, Zimmer Dental, Biomet 3i, Straumann, Nobel Biocare, and Thommen Medical). All MTLDs had been in use for at least 6 months without being recalibrated, and all were tested to determine their accuracy in delivering target torque values. Statistical analysis used nonparametric tests to determine the accuracy of the MTLDs in delivering target torque values, and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to assess pairwise comparisons. ResultsAfter clinical service, spring-style MTLDs were significantly more accurate than friction-style MTLDs (P<.05). ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, it was concluded that after clinical service, spring-style MTLDs were more accurate than friction-style MTLDs. All MTLDs delivered torque values within 10% of the target torque value.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
