Abstract

To see whether acute intraoperative recordings using stereo EEG (SEEG) electrodes can replace prolonged interictal intracranial EEG (iEEG) recording, making the process more efficient and safer, 10 min of iEEG were recorded following electrode implantation in 16 anesthetized patients, and 1–2 days later during non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Ripples on oscillations (RonO, 80–250 Hz), ripples on spikes (RonS), sharp-spikes, fast RonO (fRonO, 250–600 Hz), and fast RonS (fRonS) were semi-automatically detected. HFO power and frequency were compared between the conditions using a generalized linear mixed-effects model. HFO rates were compared using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with anesthesia type and SOZ as factors. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis quantified seizure onset zone (SOZ) classification accuracy, and the scalar product was used to assess spatial reliability. Resection of contacts with the highest rate of events was compared with outcome. During sleep, all HFOs, except fRonO, were larger in amplitude compared to intraoperatively (p < 0.01). HFO frequency was also affected (p < 0.01). Anesthesia selection affected HFO and sharp-spike rates. In both conditions combined, sharp-spikes and all HFO subtypes were increased in the SOZ (p < 0.01). However, the increases were larger during the sleep recordings (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curves for SOZ classification were significantly smaller for intraoperative sharp-spikes, fRonO, and fRonS rates (p < 0.05). HFOs and spikes were only significantly spatially reliable for a subset of the patients (p < 0.05). A failure to resect fRonO areas in the sleep recordings trended the most sensitive and accurate for predicting failure. In summary, HFO morphology is altered by anesthesia. Intraoperative SEEG recordings exhibit increased rates of HFOs in the SOZ, but their spatial distribution can differ from sleep recordings. Recording these biomarkers during non-REM sleep offers a more accurate delineation of the SOZ and possibly the epileptogenic zone.

Highlights

  • To see whether acute intraoperative recordings using stereo EEG (SEEG) electrodes can replace prolonged interictal intracranial EEG recording, making the process more efficient and safer, 10 min of iEEG were recorded following electrode implantation in 16 anesthetized patients, and 1–2 days later during non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep

  • Using boot-strap analysis, we found that the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) (AUROC) curve was larger for RonO and ripples on spikes (RonS) during non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep recordings than during the intraoperative recordings, and was significantly larger for sharp-spikes, fRonO, and fast RonS (fRonS) (p < 0.05, n = 1000 surrogates, Fig. 3A–E)

  • Intraoperative recordings under anesthesia altered high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) morphology, rate, and in some patients, the spatial distribution compared to HFO from the same electrode contacts recorded during non-REM sleep

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To see whether acute intraoperative recordings using stereo EEG (SEEG) electrodes can replace prolonged interictal intracranial EEG (iEEG) recording, making the process more efficient and safer, 10 min of iEEG were recorded following electrode implantation in 16 anesthetized patients, and 1–2 days later during non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Intraoperative SEEG recordings exhibit increased rates of HFOs in the SOZ, but their spatial distribution can differ from sleep recordings. Recording these biomarkers during non-REM sleep offers a more accurate delineation of the SOZ and possibly the epileptogenic zone. Results from several studies suggest high-frequency oscillations (HFOs: ripples 80–250 Hz, fast ripples 250–600 Hz)[3,4,6,7,9,10,11] is a more specific biomarker of EZ than interictal spikes. Few studies have compared the spatial accuracy of spikes and HFOs in intraoperative ECoG recordings to extraoperative prolonged recordings for identifying the ­EZ19–23. Since electrocorticography is commonly performed, and HFOs may replace or supplement spikes in tailoring resection during ­ECoG25, the accuracy of spikes and HFOs for the EZ in intraoperative recordings must be further clarified with respects to the influence of anesthesia and analgesia

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call