Accuracy of Electron Density Mapping of a Novel kVCBCT System Designed for Planning

Abstract

A recently developed advanced kVCBCT system, designed for simulation and planning, includes improvements to the imaging panel and reconstruction technique, enabling more accurate electron density mapping than a typical CBCT. This study investigates the accuracy, limitations, and dosimetric impact of this new system. CBCT images were taken of both large (pelvis) and small (head) electron density phantoms with inserts ranging from lung (0.29) to cortical bone (1.69). Images were taken with several pre-set protocols with energies of 125 kVp and 140 kVp. The effects of longitudinal buildup (for scatter due to the cone-beam geometry) and blade position were also investigated. The HU values of each insert were measured over a small region of interest. Several electron density curves were generated - pelvis protocol on the large phantom, head protocol on the small phantom, and average - and imported into a treatment planning system. Dose calculation was performed using each curve and differences were observed. HU to electron density mapping was sensitive to the use of longitudinal buildup and blade position, with differences in the curves observed at both low and high electron densities, due to imager saturation effects not found in typical clinical scenarios. Subsequent studies used both longitudinal buildup and fully opened blades. Under these conditions, mapping was not sensitive to technique or phantom size at low electron densities. At higher values, the curves diverged, with the head protocol showing higher HU values and the pelvis protocol showing lower. The average curve matched very closely with the curve from our standard CT simulator. Dose calculation showed little dependence on the curve chosen, with max point dose differences of 1.2% between the pelvis and average scans, though most of the plan was <0.5% different. Results for the head protocol were similar. The system provides reliable HU values comparable to a CT simulator, though it is important to consider the effects of imager saturation by choosing appropriate scatter and collimation. The calibration is slightly sensitive to the choice of phantom size and beam energy, though these differences led to negligible (<0.5%) differences in dose calculation accuracy.