Abstract

To assess the initial accuracy, drift in calibration over several hours, and decline in accuracy over daily use of blood pressure transducers used in the critical care setting. Prospective, criterion standard. Three critical care units in a university hospital. Twenty-seven consecutively available high-pressure transducers were used to measure intra-arterial blood pressures, and 11 consecutively available low-pressure transducers were used to measure central venous and pulmonary arterial blood pressures. High-pressure transducers were compared with a mercury column manometer, and low-pressure transducers were compared with a water column manometer at three pressure levels. Data were collected initially after installation of the pressure transducer, at 3 hrs, and at 6 hrs. Data collections were repeated on subsequent days. a) The majority of pressure transducers are accurate; b) there is no drift in the accuracy of pressure transducers over several hours; c) the accuracy of pressure transducers does not decline over subsequent days. Some transducers over-estimated standard pressures by 10 mm Hg and/or underestimated standard pressure by 17 mm Hg. The majority of pressure transducers used in the critical care setting are accurate, although there are some transducers that may compromise patient care. Blood pressure transducers should be checked against a standard manometer upon installation, and daily during use.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.