Abstract

In this study, the accuracy (precision and trueness) of digital impressions and the fitness of single crowns manufactured based on digital impressions were evaluated. #14-17 epoxy resin dentitions were made, while full-crown preparations of extracted natural teeth were embedded at #16. (1) To assess precision, deviations among repeated scan models made by intraoral scanner TRIOS and MHT and model scanner D700 and inEos were calculated through best-fit algorithm and three-dimensional (3D) comparison. Root mean square (RMS) and color-coded difference images were offered. (2) To assess trueness, micro computed tomography (micro-CT) was used to get the reference model (REF). Deviations between REF and repeated scan models (from (1)) were calculated. (3) To assess fitness, single crowns were manufactured based on TRIOS, MHT, D700 and inEos scan models. The adhesive gaps were evaluated under stereomicroscope after cross-sectioned. Digital impressions showed lower precision and better trueness. Except for MHT, the means of RMS for precision were lower than 10 μm. Digital impressions showed better internal fitness. Fitness of single crowns based on digital impressions was up to clinical standard. Digital impressions could be an alternative method for single crowns manufacturing.

Highlights

  • In 1971, Duret first put forward the concept of applying computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in dentistry [1]

  • Several studies had been done in the last three years, the accuracy of TRIOS and MHT intraoral scanners were not mentioned. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital impressions acquired by TRIOS and 3D progress intraoral scanners, to detect the fitness of single crowns based on digital impressions and to compare with stone cast images from D700 (3Shape) and inEos

  • Patient-related factors influence the accuracy of digital impressions [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1971, Duret first put forward the concept of applying computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in dentistry [1]. Digital impression technique is an access to the CAD/CAM workflow that abutment and arch information are captured directly in patients’ mouth by intraoral scanning. Several studies had been done in the last three years, the accuracy of TRIOS and MHT intraoral scanners were not mentioned The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital impressions acquired by TRIOS and 3D progress intraoral scanners, to detect the fitness of single crowns based on digital impressions and to compare with stone cast images from D700 (3Shape) and inEos The tested null hypothesis was that the accuracy of digital impressions is same with stone cast images, and the fitness of final restorations based on digital impressions and stone cast images have no significant difference

Model Fabrication and Grouping
Precision
Trueness
Marginal and Internal Fit
Results and Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.