Abstract
Statement of problemThe use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technologies is widely established, with single restorations or short fixed partial dentures having similar accuracy when generated from digital scans or conventional impressions. However, research on complete-arch scanning of edentulous jaws is sparse. PurposeThe purpose of this pilot in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of a digital scan with the conventional method in a workflow generating implant-supported complete-arch prostheses and to establish whether interference from flexible soft tissue segments affects accuracy. Material and methodsAn edentulous maxillary master cast containing 6 angled implant analogs was used and digitized with mounted scan bodies by using a high-precision laboratory scanner. The master cast was then scanned 10 times with 4 different intraoral scanners: TRIOS 3 with a complete-arch scanning strategy (TRI1) or implant-scanning strategy (TRI2), TRIOS Color (TRC), CEREC Omnicam (CER), and CEREC Primescan (PS). The same procedure was repeated with 4 different levels of free gingiva (G0–G3). Ten conventional impressions were obtained. Differences in implant position and direction were evaluated at the implant shoulder as mean values for trueness and interquartile range (IQR) for precision. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Kruskal–Wallis and post hoc Conover tests (α=.05). ResultsAt G0, position deviations ranged from 34.8 μm (IQR 23.0 μm) (TRC) to 68.3 μm (12.2 μm) (CER). Direction deviations ranged from 0.34 degrees (IQR 0.18 degrees) (conventional) to 0.57 degrees (IQR 0.37 degrees) (TRI2). For digital systems, the position deviation ranged from 48.4 μm (IQR 5.9 μm) (PS) to 76.6 μm (IQR 8.1 μm) (TRC) at G1, from 36.3 μm (IQR 9.3 μm) (PS) to 79.9 μm (IQR 36.1 μm) (TRI1) at G2, and from 51.8 μm (IQR 14.3 μm) (PS) to 257.5 μm (IQR 106.3 μm) (TRC) at G3. The direction deviation ranged from 0.45 degrees (IQR 0.15 degrees) (CER) to 0.64 degrees (IQR 0.20 degrees) (TRC) at G1, from 0.38 degrees (IQR 0.05 degrees) (PS) to 0.925 degrees (IQR 0.09 degrees) (TRI) at G2, and from 0.44 degrees (IQR 0.07 degrees) (PS) to 1.634 degrees (IQR 1.08 degrees) (TRI) at G3. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the test groups for position (G0: P<.001; G1: P<.05; G2: P<.001; G3: P<.001) and direction (G0: P<.005; G1: P<.001; G2: P<.001; G3: P<.001). ConclusionsWithout soft tissue interference, the accuracy of certain digital scanning systems was comparable with that of the conventional impression technique. The amount of flexible soft tissue interference affected the accuracy of the digital scans.
Highlights
The purpose of this pilot in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of a digital scan with the conventional method in a workflow generating implant-supported complete-arch prostheses and to establish whether interference from flexible soft tissue segments affects accuracy
At G0, position deviations ranged from 34.8 mm (IQR 23.0 mm) (TRC) to 68.3 mm (12.2 mm) (CER)
Direction deviations ranged from 0.34 degrees (IQR 0.18 degrees) to 0.57 degrees
Summary
An edentulous maxillary master cast containing 6 angled implant analogs was used and digitized with mounted scan bodies by using a high-precision laboratory scanner. An edentulous maxillary stone cast containing 6 implant analogs (Biomet 3i Certain 3.4; Zimmer Biomet) in the regions of the first molars, first premolars, and lateral incisors was used as a reference model (Fig. 1A). Each test group consisted of 10 repeated scans or impressions (n=10). For the reference scan evaluation, the master model was scanned 10 times from different directions with a high-precision laboratory scanner (EOLS) (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona) to evaluate the EOLS accuracy (Fig. 1D).[46] The data sets were superimposed and evaluated as described subsequently. As EOLS showed highly accurate scanning results, one scan was selected to be used as a reference for later comparisons with all test groups
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
