Abstract

Screening for depression remains a priority for people living with HIV (PLWH) accessing care. The nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used depression screening tool, but has limited accuracy when applied across various cultural contexts. We aimed to evaluate the performance of alternative PHQ-9 scoring algorithms in sub-Saharan African PLWH. five HIV programs in Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Senegal and the Republic of Congo. Adult PLWH were screened for depression during the 2018-2022 period. Diagnosis confirmation was done by psychiatrist blinded clinical evaluation (gold standard). Diagnostic performances, including sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC)) of the traditional PHQ-9 scoring (positive screening - score≥10) was compared to alternative scoring algorithms including: i) the presence of ≥1 mood symptom (PHQ-9 items 1&2) combined with ≥2 other symptoms listed in the PHQ-9, and ii) a simplified recoding of each 4-response item into two categories (absence/presence). A total of 735 participants were included (54% female, median age 42 years [IQR 34-50]). Depression was diagnosed by a psychiatrist in 95(13%) participants. Alternative scoring sensitivities (0.59 to 0.74) were higher than that of the traditional score's (0.39). Compared to traditional scoring, AUC were significantly higher for PHQ-9 alternative scoring. Across settings, alternative scoring algorithms increased sensitivity and reduced variability. As a primary screening test, new scoring algorithms appeared to improve the PHQ-9 sensitivity in identifying depression and reduce heterogeneity across settings. This alternative might be considered to identify PLWH in need of referral for further diagnostic evaluations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.