Abstract

Abstract. Nowadays, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) are a wide used technique for acquisition in order to create buildings 3D models, providing the acquisition of a high number of images at very high resolution or video sequences, in a very short time. Since low-cost UASs are preferred, the accuracy of a building 3D model created using this platforms must be evaluated. To achieve results, the dean's office building from the Faculty of “Hydrotechnical Engineering, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering” of Iasi, Romania, has been chosen, which is a complex shape building with the roof formed of two hyperbolic paraboloids. Seven points were placed on the ground around the building, three of them being used as GCPs, while the remaining four as Check points (CPs) for accuracy assessment. Additionally, the coordinates of 10 natural CPs representing the building characteristic points were measured with a Leica TCR 405 total station. The building 3D model was created as a point cloud which was automatically generated based on digital images acquired with the low-cost UASs, using the image matching algorithm and different software like 3DF Zephyr, Visual SfM, PhotoModeler Scanner and Drone2Map for ArcGIS. Except for the PhotoModeler Scanner software, the interior and exterior orientation parameters were determined simultaneously by solving a self-calibrating bundle adjustment. Based on the UAS point clouds, automatically generated by using the above mentioned software and GNSS data respectively, the parameters of the east side hyperbolic paraboloid were calculated using the least squares method and a statistical blunder detection. Then, in order to assess the accuracy of the building 3D model, several comparisons were made for the facades and the roof with reference data, considered with minimum errors: TLS mesh for the facades and GNSS mesh for the roof. Finally, the front facade of the building was created in 3D based on its characteristic points using the PhotoModeler Scanner software, resulting a CAD (Computer Aided Design) model. The results showed the high potential of using low-cost UASs for building 3D model creation and if the building 3D model is created based on its characteristic points the accuracy is significantly improved.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) are a widely used technique for acquisition in order to create building 3D models, providing the acquisition of a high number of images at very high resolutions or video sequences

  • Point clouds and surface models automatically generated from terrestrial digital imagery using the open-source software Bundler/PMVS2, free software VisualSFM, Autodesk Web Service 123D Catch beta and low-cost software Agisoft PhotoScan were compared with the results from terrestrial laser scanning, concluding that the models derived from imagery could not achieve the same quality of geometrical accuracy as laser scanning (Kersten et al, 2015)

  • 3.1.2 Quality assessment: In order to assess the accuracy of the building 3D model, first the coordinates of the Check points (CPs) were measured on oriented images and compared with the ones determined with high accuracy using the GNSS technology

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) are a widely used technique for acquisition in order to create building 3D models, providing the acquisition of a high number of images at very high resolutions or video sequences. Point clouds and surface models automatically generated from terrestrial digital imagery using the open-source software Bundler/PMVS2, free software VisualSFM, Autodesk Web Service 123D Catch beta and low-cost software Agisoft PhotoScan were compared with the results from terrestrial laser scanning, concluding that the models derived from imagery could not achieve the same quality of geometrical accuracy as laser scanning (Kersten et al, 2015). In Remondino et al (2012) an investigation of automated image orientation packages, i.e Agisoft, Photosynth, Bundler, Apero and Visual SfM is presented, in order to clarify potentialities and performances when dealing with large and complex datasets.

STUDY AREA AND DATA AQUISITION
Photogrammetric data processing
Quality assessment
D Xr Xi 2 Yr Yi 2 Zr Zi 2
Photogrammetric data acquisition and processing
Modelling the building roof
COMPARING THE 3D MODELS OF THE BUILDING
Comparing the building roof created by different software
Comparing the building facades created by different software
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call