Accuracy and Reproducibility of Intraoperative Assessment on Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces in Stage 1 Lung Adenocarcinomas

Abstract

IntroductionTumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is associated with worse prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas, particularly in sublobar resection. Intraoperative consultation for STAS has been advocated to guide surgical management. However, data on accuracy and reproducibility of intraoperative assessment of STAS remain limited. We evaluated diagnostic yield, interobserver agreement (IOA), and intraobserver agreement (ITA) for STAS detection on frozen section (FS). MethodsA panel of three pathologists evaluated stage 1 lung adenocarcinomas (n = 100) for the presence or absence of STAS and artifacts as reference. Five pulmonary pathologists independently reviewed all cases in two rounds, detecting STAS and artifacts in FS and the corresponding FS permanent and non-FS permanent, with a consensus conference between rounds. ResultsThe FS had low sensitivity (44%), high specificity (91%), relatively high accuracy (71%), and overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 for detecting STAS. The average ITA was moderate for both STAS (κmean: 0.598) and artifact (κmean: 0.402) detection on FS. IOA was moderate for STAS (κround-1: 0.453; κround-2: 0.506) and fair for artifact (κround-1: 0.300; κround-2: 0.204) detection on FS. IOA for STAS improved in FS permanent and non-FS permanent, whereas ITA was similar across section types. On multivariable logistic regression, the only significant predictor of diagnostic discordance was the presence of artifacts. ConclusionsFS is highly specific but not sensitive for STAS detection in stage 1 lung adenocarcinomas. IOA on STAS is moderate in FS and improved only marginally after a consensus conference, raising concerns regarding global implementation of intraoperative assessment of STAS and warranting more precise criteria for STAS and artifacts.