Abstract

6523 Background: Decisions about prognosis, adjuvant chemo/radiation therapy and clinical trial eligibility require careful examination of the surgical resection specimen. In January 2004, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer mandated reportage of specific items after resection of lung cancer. The extent of compliance is unknown. Methods: We examined final pathology reports for all lung cancer resections in the Memphis Metropolitan Area from January 2004 to December 2007. End-points were the percentage of reports with each CAP item and the 6 most vital determinants of post-operative management and accuracy of TNM staging. Chi-square test was used for year to year comparisons. Results: Table 1 shows frequency of reportage of CAP items. Of those with reported pT stage, it was accurate in 242 of 263 (92.02%) identified as T1; 193 of 208 (92.79%) T2; 21 of 24 (87.5%) T3; 11 of 11 (100%) T4. The most common T-staging error, understaging of satellite nodules (T4), occurred in 12 of 21 (57%) mis-staged as T1, 11 of 15 (73%) T2, 3 of 3 (100%) T3. Overall, 62.6% of reports accurately identified pT-stage. Of those with reported pN-stage, 351 of 352 (99.7%) accurately identified N0; 69 of 81 (85.2%) accurately identified N1, 12 of 81 (14.81%) N1 designations were actually N2; 27 of 27 (100%) N2 designations were accurate; 31 of 34 (91.2%) identified as Nx (no lymph nodes in the specimen) were accurate, 3 (8.8%) were truly N0. Overall, 64.08% of reports accurately identified pN-stage. 4 of 503 identified as pMx (0.8%) had pM1. There was no change in proportion of incomplete and/or inaccurate pathology reports over the 4 years of analysis. Conclusions: Pathology evaluation of lung cancer resection specimens is frequently incomplete or inaccurate, potentially impairing clinical decision-making. Satellite nodules are often understaged. Simple corrective interventions such as enforcement of mandatory institutional utilization of the CAP checklist and AJCC staging manual need to be investigated. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.