Abstract

In reaction to what they considered the prevailing bias of second language acquisition (SLA) research towards cognitive-oriented theories, Firth and Wagner (1997) called for a greater recognition of the social context and interactive nature of language use. Without negating the importance of cognitive dimensions of learning, the authors noted that ―language is acquired and learned through social interaction … and should be studied in interactive encounters‖ (Firth & Wagner, 1997, p. 287). The article set off a firestorm of controversy. Some critics argued that language acquisition is ―fundamentally a psycholinguistic process‖ (Gass & Selinker, 2001, p. 239), and that language acquisition and language use are two entirely separate entities (Gass 1998). Firth and Wagner acknowledged this criticism, but still maintained that language acquisition ―is built on language use‖ (Firth & Wagner, 2007, p. 806) and that it is a process that takes place ―in the micromoments of social interaction‖ (Firth & Wagner, 2007, p. 807). This perspective was echoed by Wenger (1998), who stated that ―learners are social beings … this fact is a central aspect of learning‖ (Wenger, 1998, p. 4).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.