Accucary of epifluorescence microscopy counts for direct estimates of bacterial numbers

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the extent and source of inaccuracies for total counts of microorganisms by filtration followed by epifluorescent microscopy. The extent of these inaccuracies were determined by comparing the microscopic method with viable plate counts while their possible sources were investigated using flow cytometry and fluorescent microbeads. One factor responsible for these accuracies was found to be the microscope conversion factor which did not take into account the total filter surface area on which the bacteria were impacted. Approximately a two-fold underestimation was observed when the filtration area rather than the effective area over which the cells are disturbed were compared. Thus it is recommended that the latter be accurately measured when calculating the conversion factor in order to reduce the inaccuracy of direct microscopic counts.