Abstract
Twenty-five individuals who had experienced infidelity in their marriage were interviewed to determine the relationship between the account, attribution, and outcome of the infidelity for the marriage. Denial, although typically considered an aggravating account, was often used initially by transgressors who were motivated to save their marriage. However, concessions proved to be the account most preferred by victims. Beyond a concession, relationship talk and remedial work appeared to largely impact whether the relationship was salvaged or terminated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
