Abstract
In Sec. 5 of a paper titled Wealth Accounting, Exhaustible Resources and Social Welfare, Hamilton and Ruta (2009) derived accounting price for an exhaustible resource in Eq. (18), in the case of the so-called Serafy economy (El Serafy 1989). However, the result is not plausible since they improperly replace constant extraction in the value of the resource stock (Eq. 17) with current resource stock divided by reserve life in their derivation. In the comment, I show the accounting price for the resource is the user cost defined by El Serafy (1989). This is an example of the consistency between the two approaches to valuing sectoral net investments compared by Wei (2013).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
