Abstract

The spatial distribution of Leaf Area Density (LAD) in a tree canopy has fundamental functions in ecosystems. It can be measured through a variety of methods, including voxel-based methods applied to LiDAR point clouds. A theoretical study recently compared the numerical errors of these methods and showed that the bias-corrected Maximum Likelihood Estimator was the most efficient. However, it ignored (i) wood volumes, (ii) vegetation sub-grid clumping, (iii) the instrument effective footprint, and (iv) was limited to a single viewpoint. In practice, retrieving LAD is not straightforward, because vegetation is not randomly distributed in sub-grids, beams are divergent, and forestry plots are sampled from more than one viewpoint to mitigate occlusion. In the present article, we extend the previous formulation to (i) account for both wood volumes and hits, (ii) rigorously include correction terms for vegetation and instrument characteristics, and (iii) integrate multiview data. Two numerical experiments showed that the new approach entailed reduction of bias and errors, especially in the presence of wood volumes or when multiview data are available for poorly-explored volumes. In addition to its conciseness, completeness, and efficiency, this new formulation can be applied to multiview TLS—and also potentially to UAV LiDAR scanning—to reduce errors in LAD estimation.

Highlights

  • The amount and spatial distribution of foliage in a tree canopy have fundamental functions in ecosystems as they affect energy and mass fluxes through photosynthesis and transpiration [1]

  • A traversal algorithm is applied to each volume of interest to compute gap fractions, hits, and for some approaches, “free paths”, in order to derive different metrics to estimate the quantity of interest [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]

  • We present a bias-corrected Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Leaf Area Density (LAD) with multiview-Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data in volumes of interest, which naturally extends the formulation presented in a previous study [15] to actual field data, with the presence of wood volumes, wood hits, correction terms to account for beam divergence, and vegetation clumping, as well as to multiview data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The amount and spatial distribution of foliage in a tree canopy have fundamental functions in ecosystems as they affect energy and mass fluxes through photosynthesis and transpiration [1]. Among the different metrics suggested in the past, a recent comprehensive theoretical study [15] has shown that the Modified Contact Frequency, first introduced in a previous study [9], corresponds to the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) [16] of the attenuation coefficient This attenuation coefficient is the rate at which the point cloud density decays with vegetation interception, which is related to the LAD and PAD linearly. Beer’s law-based methods are still more popular than the MLE [2], they do not take full advantage of the tridimensional information available in the point cloud, by ignoring free paths, which leads to additional complexity in the inversion when the path length is not constant (simple cosine term in gap fraction methods, but complex corrections in crown volumes [8] and voxels [15,17]). H winhcreeraesΛes(winitmh−th1)eivsoaxneel sstiizme atotocroomf ptheensaattteenfouratthioenecffoeecffit ocfievnetg, eGtaitsiothneclduimmpeninsgioinnlseisdselevaofxpelrso,jwechtiiocnh fcaacutsoers, adndiscHrepisanacdieims etnosiothnelestshecoorrerteicctailolny faracntodrotmhatdaisctcroibuunttisonforotfhevelagseetrateioffnecteivleemfoenottsp,rinast ina cclounmsepqeudenvceegeotfaJteionnse[n14’s].cOonbvseexrvitaytiionnesqusualgitgyes[t14th,1a2t,1H8,d20ec].reItasaelssowdiethpethnedsdiosntatnhceestcoatnhneesr,caannndetrotoa cleosmsepreenxstaetnetf,oornthfeoliinacgreeamseoripnheoffleocgtiicvael fdoioftfperreinntcecsaubseetdwbeeynbespamecideisv[e1r4g]e,naclethaonudghvatrhiaetieolenminenrettsuirzne danetdecsthiaopne, wcahnicaht lienadstupceasrtaianllyinbcereaacsceooufnttehde faoprptahrreonutgahrethaeonfovtieognetoafti“oenffeecletimvee”nftrse[e1p4,a1t8h]. zAe l(sion,mH, isnecereaaspersevwiiotuhsthsetuvdoyxe[l1s5i]zeortoEcqoumatpioennsa(3te) fboerlothwe eaffnedctAopfpveengdetixatiAon). cTluhme pdiinmgeinnssiiodnelevsosxpelrso,jwechtiiochn cfuaunscetisodnisGcrceapnanbceiesesptoartahteeltyheeostriemticaatelldy [r9a,n2d1]o.m distribution of vegetation elements, as a consequence of JenFsoern’as cgoinvvenexivtyiewinpeqouinatl,ittyh[e12a,1tt4e,n1u8,a2t0io].nItcaolesfofidcieepnetndcasnonbetheesstcimananteedr, afnrodmto tahleesMsearxeixmteunmt, oLnikfeolilhiaogoedmeostripmhaotloorg(iMcaLl Ed)i.ffIetriesnecqeusablettowteheennsupmecbieers o[1f4h]i,taslNthioduigvhidtehdebeyletmheensut smizoefafnredesphaatphes cΣazn, aint lmea(sFtipgaurrteia1l)l,ywbheiacchcaoruenctoedmfpourttehdrowuigthhathtreanvoetrisoanl aolfg“oerffitehcmti:ve” free path ze (in m, see a previous study [15] separately or Equation (3) below estimated [9,21]. and

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call