Abstract

Example 9.3.1.1 of JCGM-S1 “Mass calibration” is analyzed, which describes the comparison in air of reference and calibrated weights having the same nominal mass. JCGM-S1 compares uncertainty evaluation procedures based on the GUM uncertainty framework and the Monte Carlo method. The article uses the procedure developed by the authors and consists in decomposing the measurement model into a Taylor series of the second order taking into account the kurtoses of the distributions of input quantities. To facilitate the calculations, the finite increment method is used. To find expanded uncertainty, the kurtosis method is used. Good agreement between the results obtained by the proposed method and the result obtained by the Monte Carlo method is shown.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.