Abstract
A key methodological challenge in understanding the relationship between the economy and the underlying ecosystem base resides in how to account for the ecosystem’s degradation and the decline of associated ecosystem services. In this study, we use information on nutrients and metals concentrations from the Environmental Change Network (ECN) database and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) for the period 2000–2010 in order to assess the assimilation capacity of water systems. The research covers five upstream sites and 17 downstream sites in northeast Scotland. Our results highlight the relevance of considering a number of pollutants, and suggest that elements such as arsenic, lead and mercury can pose a threat to ecosystems’ sustainability and health. However, little research has been done in terms of their assimilation capacity and their impact on grey water footprint assessments. In addition, the results indicate that background conditions might be relevant when performing sustainability analysis at different spatial scales. The study also poses relevant questions in relation to land management approaches versus traditional ‘end-of-pipe’ water treatment approaches, and the definition of maximum and background concentrations. In this regard, further studies will be required to understand the trade-offs between different ecosystem services depending on how these concentrations are defined.
Highlights
The benefits of water quality and its impact on ecosystems have led water to become a policy priority in many parts of the world [1,2,3]
We examine the evolution of water quality and the assimilative capacity of water bodies in northeast Scotland, which is a necessary step for the assessment of the grey water footprint (GWF)
Our results highlight the relevance of considering a number of pollutants when estimating the assimilative capacity of water systems and, subsequently, the GWF
Summary
The benefits of water quality and its impact on ecosystems have led water to become a policy priority in many parts of the world [1,2,3]. There is an increasing interest in accounting for both the contribution of water resources to the economy and the impact the economy has on water systems [5,6]. In this respect, a number of papers have applied the environmental. Empirical evidence of an inverted U-shape relationship between economic growth and pollution has been mixed [6,7,8,9]. In the case of water resources, Miglietta et al [6] have shown that there is no evidence of an inverted U-relationship between economic growth and water use, when using the
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
