Abstract
Abstract In the presence of unmeasured spatial confounding, spatial models may actually increase (rather than decrease) bias, leading to uncertainty as to how they should be applied in practice. We evaluated spatial modelling approaches through simulation and application to a big data electronic health record study. Whereas the risk of bias was high for purely spatial exposures (e.g. built environment), we found very limited potential for increased bias for individual-level exposures that cluster spatially (e.g. smoking status). We also proposed a novel exposure-penalized spline approach that selects the degree of spatial smoothing to explain spatial variability in the exposure. This approach appeared promising for efficiently reducing spatial confounding bias.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
