Abstract
It is frequently alleged that inequality is overstated when the non-market sector is ignored. This paper tests this proposition empirically, using detailed survey data from Malaysia. Indeed, we find that when the definition of income is broadened to include the value of non-market activities, income levels rise, especially among the poor, and inequality falls. In these data, it is the average number of hours of work considered to produce ‘income’, and not their distribution, that affects income inequality. This underscores the need for great caution in interpreting intercounty or intertemporal comparisons of inequality.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
