Abstract

Heterogeneity-preserving property models of subsurface regions are commonly constructed by means of sequential simulations. Sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and direct sequential simulation (DSS) draw values from a local probability density function that is described by the simple kriging estimate and the local simple kriging variance at unsampled locations. The local simple kriging variance, however, does not necessarily reflect the geological variability being present at subsets of the target domain. In order to address that issue, we propose a new workflow that implements two modified versions of the popular SGS and DSS algorithms. Both modifications, namely, LVM-DSS and LVM-SGS, aim at simulating values by means of introducing a local variance model (LVM). The LVM is a measurement-constrained and geology-driven global representation of the locally observable variance of a property. The proposed modified algorithms construct the local probability density function with the LVM instead of using the simple kriging variance, while still using the simple kriging estimate as the best linear unbiased estimator. In an outcrop analog study, we can demonstrate that the local simple kriging variance in sequential simulations tends to underestimate the locally observed geological variability in the target domain and certainly does not account for the spatial distribution of the geological heterogeneity. The proposed simulation algorithms reproduce the global histogram, the global heterogeneity, and the considered variogram model in the range of ergodic fluctuations. LVM-SGS outperforms the other algorithms regarding the reproduction of the variogram model. While DSS and SGS generate a randomly distributed heterogeneity, the modified algorithms reproduce a geologically reasonable spatial distribution of heterogeneity instead. The new workflow allows for the integration of continuous geological trends into sequential simulations rather than using class-based approaches such as the indicator simulation technique.

Highlights

  • Drawing conclusions from uncertain data in Earth sciences is rather usual than unusual

  • In order to enhance the accuracy of sequential simulations, we propose a new workflow, which incorporates the local variability derived from measurements on a subset of Ω into sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and direct sequential simulation (DSS) under the consideration of measurement errors

  • The variogram analysis reveals a range of 0.3 m and 0.2 m for the rock cube samples OSB1_c and OSB2_c, respectively, and a range of 18 m for the outcrop samples (Figure 5a,d,g)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drawing conclusions from uncertain data in Earth sciences is rather usual than unusual. Each measurement in geoscientific studies is affected by measurement errors and represents only a subset of the natural variability of geological media. The natural variability is a substantial business-critical controlling factor of different types of subsurface utilization such as mining, hydrocarbon and geothermal exploitation, carbon capture and storage, or nuclear waste disposal. The physical variability of rocks is defined as the complexity or heterogeneity of a system within time and space [1]. Even marginal discrepancies from the predicted property distributions in the subsurface can lead to inaccurate simulations of a quarrie’s production potential or a reservoir’s recovery and life-time [2,3]. The small-scale variability of rock physical properties makes field-sized predictions still challenging

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call