Abstract
Concrete's extensive use worldwide comes with significant environmental cost, contributing to 8% of annual global carbon emissions. This study investigates the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) and technoeconomic assessment (TEA) as tools to quantify anticipated reductions in global warming potential (GWP) arising from use of novel concrete mixtures or innovative production techniques, with specific focus on a case study related to graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) as functional fillers. LCA and TEA results are reported for several choices of functional unit (FU) and system boundaries (SB). This approach illustrates how various LCA and TEA framings are differently useful to articulate how changes in technical performance properties such as mechanical strength and durability influence overall life-cycle environmental impacts. Framing 1 make use of a nominal volume-based FU (1 m3) and cradle-to-gate SB. Under this framing, addition of GNPs to the base mix seems to increase GWP and production cost. Framing 2 makes use of a strength-normalized FU and cradle-to-gate SB. Under this framing, life-cycle GWP and production cost for the GNP-amended mortars are decreased relative to the control, due to the appreciable increase in mechanical strength of the GNP-amended mortars. Finally, Framing 3 makes use of the nominal volume-based FU (1 m3) and cradle-to-grave SB. Under this framing, GWP and production cost for the GNP-amended mortars again seem to decrease, due to improved durability which gives rise to longer estimated service life and reduced maintenance. This study illustrates that use of GNPs as functional filler is a seemingly promising strategy for decarbonizing concrete. More broadly, it is concluded that LCAs and TEAs of novel concretes should be framed in a way that articulates how changes in mechanical strength and/or durability properties contribute to changes in environmental impacts over all stages of the concrete life-cycle (i.e., cradle-to-grave). Such framing will help ensure that results that are meaningful to support decision-making in the area of sustainable construction materials.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.