Abstract

This paper empirically examines the relationship between conservatism and earnings management in chemical and allied products manufacturers via an analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense. Data used in the study included total accounts receivable, the total allowance for uncollectible accounts, total assets, and other firm-level data from the COMPUSTAT database of North American firms for companies with the standardized industry code (SIC) of 28 which represents chemical and allied products manufacturers. Chemical and allied products manufacturers were deemed an ideal target for the study because the industry typically has large balances in accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. Bad debt expense and write-offs were also used; these were obtained from the firms’ forms 10K Schedule II filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) during the study period from 2005-2017. Analysts reports were also used, as obtained from Bloomberg for each firm. Results from subsequent regression analyses indicate that firms utilized excessive conservatism within the allowance for doubtful accounts to manage earnings to achieve earnings goals throughout the study period.

Highlights

  • This research investigates earnings management for firms that are poorly performing or close to meeting or beating analysts’ projections

  • This paper empirically examines the relationship between conservatism and earnings management in chemical and allied products manufacturers via an analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense

  • H1a states that companies with severe losses or poor performing firms will increase their bad debt expense or take a “big bath”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This research investigates earnings management for firms that are poorly performing or close to meeting or beating analysts’ projections. Few have researched the allowance for doubtful accounts even though accounts receivable is a material balance sheet account for numerous companies. McNichols and Wilson (1988) modeled bad debt expense based on economic determinants that explain significant portions of bad debt expense. Others found that firms manage earnings using receivables (Teoh, Wong, & Rao, 1998; Marquardt & Wiedmand, 2004; Caylor, 2010). Jackson and Liu (2010) performed extensive research on the allowance for doubtful accounts through 2004. Their research did not consider the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of the accounts receivable balance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call