Abstract
This chapter examines the conceptual framework underlying a series of reform initiatives implemented between 1980 and 1988 to improve primary school quality in Thailand. The two approaches used (accountability and capacity-building) led to increased test scores and a greater focus on the academic purpose of schooling. During the latter part of the decade, however, tensions between the two approaches surfaced which threaten future progress. These tensions derive in part from enduring dilemmas in the Thai educational system between centralization and decentralization, participation and passivity. Continued improvement in primary school quality may depend on new ways of conceptualizing policy choices to address these dilemmas.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.