Abstract

A new generation of adaptive, multi-arm clinical trials has been developed in cancer research including those offering experimental treatments to patients based on the genomic analysis of their cancer. Depending on the molecular changes found in patients’ cancer cells, it is anticipated that targeted and personalised therapies will be made available for those who have reached the end of standard treatment options, potentially extending survival time. Results from these trials are also expected to advance genomic knowledge for patients in the future. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of one such trial in the UK, comprising observations of out-patient clinic appointments, out-patient biopsy procedures, laboratory work, and interviews with practitioners, this paper explores how the clinical and research value of one such trial was accomplished in everyday practice by focussing on the work of clinical trials and laboratory staff across recruitment, laboratory analysis, and results management. In the face of numerous potential set-backs, disappointments and failure, we explore how practitioners worked to balance the need to meet established measures of value such as numbers of patients recruited into the trial, alongside cultivating the value of positive affects for patients by managing their expectations and emotions. This care work was performed primarily by practitioners whose roles have historically been devalued in healthcare practice and yet, as we show, were critical to this process. We conclude by arguing that as complex multi-arm adaptive trials become more commonplace, we need to attend to, and render visible, the dynamic and care-full valuation practices of backstage practitioners through which experimental biomedicine is accomplished, and in doing so show that care both achieves clinical and research value, and is also a series of practices and processes that tends to tissue, patients and staff in the context of ever-present possibility of failure.

Highlights

  • Scientific advances in cancer research have led to techniques for understanding the molecular profile of cancer tumours and subsequently the development of targeted therapies and treatments

  • Randomised control trials, the ‘gold standard’ of evidence-based medicine, have been superseded by what Keating and Cambrosio (2011) describe as a ‘new style of practice’ in medical oncology, which is based on large scale, multi-sited trials to develop targeted therapies for subtypes of cancers based on genomic profiling (See Berry, 2015; Shojaee and Nana-Sinkam, 2017)

  • The clinical value of these large-scale, adaptive trials for patients is that, depending on the molecular changes found in patients' cancer cells, targeted and personalised therapies may become available at different points on the treatment pathway and when they have reached the end of standard treatment options, potentially extending survival time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientific advances in cancer research have led to techniques for understanding the molecular profile of cancer tumours and subsequently the development of targeted therapies and treatments. The ‘genomic turn’ in cancer clinical trials (Nelson et al, 2014) has primarily been studied by sociologists interested in epistemic and institutional developments in biomedicine and technoscience (see Cambrosio et al, 2017; Keating and Cambrosio, 2011; Kohli-Laven et al, 2011), with only a few studies exploring practitioners' and patients' embodied experiences of trial participation (see for example, Brown and de Graff, 2015) Whilst scholars such as Keating and Cambrosio (2011) have explored the continually shifting organisational and institutional practices and procedures which render large-scale research workable, less attention has been given to the everyday practices involved in trial work (Dussauge et al, 2015; Helgesson and Krafve, 2015; Heuts and Mol, 2013). Our focus is on how these labours became ‘generative doings’ in the accomplishment of experimental biomedicine and in negotiating the complexities provoked by these large-scale genomic based trials (Puig de la Bellacasa, 2017: 54)

Methods
Practices of recruitment to the screening study: managing expectations
Handling tissue across the laboratory and the clinic: containing precarity
Managing results and their absence
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call