Abstract
It is over a quarter of a century since Henry Miller's classical paper on accident neurosis appeared in which he stressed the importance of compensation proceedings in perpetuating symptoms following accidents or trauma when there was no organic basis for them. Since then, his views have held sway with the medical and legal professions, despite a large body of research which has disputed his findings. In addition to a consideration of the aetiology and diagnosis of this condition, psychiatric management of such cases is critically reviewed, emphasizing the possible influence of iatrogenic factors on outcome and prognosis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
