Abstract

Cardiac accessory pathways (APs) in Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome are conventionally diagnosed with decision tree algorithms; however, there are problems with clinical usage. We assessed the efficacy of the artificial intelligence model using electrocardiography (ECG) and chest X-rays to identify the location of APs. We retrospectively used ECG and chest X-rays to analyse 206 patients with WPW syndrome. Each AP location was defined by an electrophysiological study and divided into four classifications. We developed a deep learning model to classify AP locations and compared the accuracy with that of conventional algorithms. Moreover, 1519 chest X-ray samples from other datasets were used for prior learning, and the combined chest X-ray image and ECG data were put into the previous model to evaluate whether the accuracy improved. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model using ECG data was significantly more accurate than the conventional tree algorithm. In the multimodal model, which implemented input from the combined ECG and chest X-ray data, the accuracy was significantly improved. Deep learning with a combination of ECG and chest X-ray data could effectively identify the AP location, which may be a novel deep learning model for a multimodal model.

Highlights

  • A decision tree algorithm using a 12-lead ECG has been used to diagnose accessory pathway (AP) in WPW ­syndrome[4,5,6]

  • artificial intelligence (AI) models corresponding to various modality images have been reported and include a model that classifies whether COVID-19 is present in the diagnosis of pneumonia by chest computed

  • Few medical AI models exist for practical use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A decision tree algorithm using a 12-lead ECG has been used to diagnose APs in WPW ­syndrome[4,5,6]. Even if the polarity of the 12-lead ECG is the same, the location of the AP may subtly differ depending on the orientation and size of each heart. Owing to these problems, differences often exist between conventional and definitive results obtained by electrophysiological studies. Extensive AI models based on deep learning have been developed, for image classification. Few medical AI models exist for practical use. Because machine learning requires definitive answers together with training data, it cannot be applied to ambiguous cases that cannot be diagnosed, which hinders its practical use in m­ edicine[11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call