Abstract

An assessment of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results from 1237 samples submitted to a multi-user facility from a five year period investigates the usage and effectiveness of common charge referencing methodologies for insulating samples. Carbon 1s (C 1s) starting peak-fitting routines for common graphitic-like materials and for adventitious carbon (AdC) are presented. An average adventitious carbon (AdC) C 1s binding energy of 284.91 eV (Std. Dev. 0.25 eV) was found for 117 samples that also contained a secondary charge reference possibility. With an understanding of the limits and possible issues with using AdC for charge referencing purposes and by incorporating other methodologies (Auger parameter, checks for data self-consistency, well-established peak-fitting routines) it was found that using AdC C 1s for charge referencing gave satisfactory and meaningful results in 95% of the 522 cases assessed. Differential charging is a common issue including in studies assessing AdC binding energies. This work demonstrates that electrical isolation (floating) of mixed insulating/semi-conducting/conducting samples significantly improves outcomes by mitigating differential charging issues.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.