Abstract
Active inference theory (AIT) is a corollary of the free-energy principle, which formalizes cognition of living system’s autopoietic organization. AIT comprises specialist terminology and mathematics used in theoretical neurobiology. Yet, active inference is common practice in human organizations, such as private companies, public institutions, and not-for-profits. Active inference encompasses three interrelated types of actions, which are carried out to minimize uncertainty about how organizations will survive. The three types of action are updating work beliefs, shifting work attention, and/or changing how work is performed. Accordingly, an alternative starting point for grasping active inference, rather than trying to understand AIT specialist terminology and mathematics, is to reflect upon lived experience. In other words, grasping active inference through autoethnographic research. In this short communication paper, accessing AIT through autoethnography is explained in terms of active inference in existing organizational practice (implicit active inference), new organizational methodologies that are informed by AIT (deliberative active inference), and combining implicit and deliberative active inference. In addition, these autoethnographic options for grasping AIT are related to generative learning.
Highlights
Many human organizations do not survive [1,2]
Active inference theory (AIT) comprises specialist terminology and mathematics from theoretical neurobiology [8,9], which can obscure that active inference is an everyday experience in human organizations
Theoretical neurobiology terminology and mathematics used in AIT may not be the best starting points for explaining AIT to the widest range of potential beneficiaries
Summary
Many human organizations do not survive [1,2]. Apropos, it is recognized in organizational studies that better understanding is needed of interactions between inference, action, and learning [3,4,5]. In other words, grasping active inference through qualitative autoethnographic research, which involves self-reflection on personal experience and connecting those reflections to wider contexts [10]. In this short communication paper, autoethnography is related to wider contexts through a common method in organizational practice: gap analysis with radar charts [11,12]. This is done to illustrate accessing AIT through common practice in human organizations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.